Two houses, both alike in dignity, in fair nor-northern Europe... Wait a minute... [Extra History Intro Theme] With Poland-Lithuania out of the fight Charles XII sets his eyes on another foe: The Russian giant, Peter the Great. While Charles had run roughshod over Poland Peter had taken advantage of the moment to once again assail the Baltic provinces.
He was stopped short of his ultimate goal but Peter's efforts there were not without gain. His armies carved a path all the way to the Swedish fortress of Nyenskans which he tore down to build an even greater fortress The Peter & Paul Fortress which would serve as the cornerstone for his most ambitious project of all: St. Petersburg. He would erect a new city here one grander and more modern than anything Russia had ever seen.
This would be his gateway to the West his port that tied Russia into the economic life of Europe. It would be his new capital, on which he would spare no expense in treasure or lives. This was to be the culmination of his legacy the embodiment of all his ideas on westernizing Russia on becoming a naval power, on embracing European art and science and culture. But for that to be the case, Russia would have to succeed in holding onto these gains something that Charles XII could not abide.
Throughout 1704 and 1705 Swedish forces tried to take Peter's great fortress but time and again, they were repelled. Soon, costs started to mount, and men who that ill afford to be lost died for little gain. So Charles revamped his strategy and blockaded St. Petersburg.
While the blockade dragged on, he began marshalling his main force for a march to the east. It was at this point that Russia sent him a peace offer: in return for an armistice, Russia would give up all of their gains except for St. Petersburg and the forts connecting it to Russian territory. But Charles was having none of it.
He knew how important St. Petersburg was. Why, with his invincible army, SHOULD he give it up? So Charles marched east, braving horrible weather and dangerous crossings to move with his traditional lightning speed. As he pressed forward, Peter fell back and back each defensive line Peter's commanders had planned to entrench was taken before their men could even unpack their spades.
But even this march could not make up for the time Charles had lost trying to make Poland support his puppet king. In the years that had followed his initial victories over the Russians and the Polish-Lithuanian forces Russia had not only seized and fortified what would become St. Petersburg but reinforced it, and kept reinforcing it. Yet, the Swedish army was strong their king was able, their officers daring and intelligent.
Top members of the military thought that it would be a tough fight but that they could take St. Petersburg. They drew up plans and submitted them to the king who swore them to utmost secrecy about the plans they had concocted. And so, the officers marched, thinking their objective to be St.
Petersburg but soon, they found themselves near Minsk. Wait a minute, that wasn't on the way to St. Petersburg! Charles had marched them in a different direction and there was only one place they could be going from there. He was marching them to Moscow.
Charles's officers had told him that they were not ready that striking so deep into Russia was simply too great of a gamble. It was something the army simply wasn't prepared for. BUT, how many times before had Charles been told that something was too great a gamble? How often had he heard that something was impossible only to then achieve it himself? He had made up his mind. They would not waste their time retaking lost territories.
He would unseat Peter himself. The first two rivers they crossed with little opposition being slowed only by the fact that the retreating Russian forces burnt every bridge along the way. Tartar horsemen also harassed them continually, but this seemed a minor nuisance. They were making good time through bad country, but then, at the Vabich River they found a large enemy force barring their passage.
The position held by the Russians was daunting: the Swedes would have to traverse marshy ground to get to them and beyond that was a forest, which might hide yet more troops. But Charles saw a way. The enemy line had a gap in it along a swampy area that the Russians clearly thought was impassable. Charles personally led his army across 1,500 yards of killing ground to reach this swampy area.
At one point, his men were shoulder deep in water. The enemy line was split. The Russians tried to use numbers to heal the breach but heroic actions from the Swedish cavalry prevented any joining of Russian arms. Soon, the line began to collapse.
The crossing was theirs. Once again, the Swedes had triumphed against impossible odds. But keen observers in the army would have noted that though the Swedes emerged victorious these Russian troops were made of sterner stuff than they had been eight years back. Tactics and firm soldiering had been hammered into them since their retreat at Narva.
They would not be turning and running like that anymore. This victory left Charles's army exhausted. It would take a month of rest before he could really move them again. And during this month, Peter was not idle.
Peter stripped the land bare. He laid waste to any stretch of ground that the Swedes would have to cross and even though it was his own country and the suffering caused to his own people was immense Peter made no half-measure of it. Every grain of wheat was carted off every pasture where a horse might graze was turned to ash. There would be nothing but wasteland for the Swedes to traverse.
Thus began a time of suffering for the Swedish forces. When they resumed their march, food was scarce. And with scarce food, came disease. This victorious army began to march as defeated men with hollow eyes and weary steps.
Charles continued to rally them, but he had no real answer to this predicament. He had been counting on living off the countryside as they marched. Their supply lines were stretched beyond their limit. Many asked him to turn home, but he believed in Swedish arms.
He believed that if he could just force Peter into one decisive battle they might yet win this war. But Peter demurred. He would not give Charles the battle he wanted. And so, the Swedish marched across fields of ash seeing always in the distance villages alight candles in remembrance to Peter's uncompromising policy of starvation.
In frustration, Charles turned to his officers and asked their advice. They recommended that the army fall back to the Dnierper, and meet up with a relief force laden with supplies. But this would be tantamount to giving up the campaign, so Charles asked for other options. Reluctantly, it was suggested that the Ukraine had not been as thoroughly plundered.
It might be possible to gather supplies there and enlist the aid of friendly Cossacks. But such a move would cut the army off from any real ability to communicate with Swedish territory, or get resupplied from the empire. Still, Charles saw it as a possible path to victory where retreat offered none. His officers pleaded with him to at least wait for the relief force and their provisions, but Charles, fearing that further delays would only give Peter more time turned the army toward Ukraine immediately.
They would now retrace their steps until they could turn south walking back across the same blasted waste from which they had just come. But as summer gave way to autumn, and autumn to winter a chill set in. Then, a deep cold. Then, a freezing, bone-gnawing frost And not just any frost.
This was what is known today as The Great Frost the coldest winter Europe has experienced in 500 years. Rivers froze from the Thames all the way down to the lagoons of Venice. And this frost served Peter well. By the time the winter of 1708 and 1709 came to an end Charles had only 20,000 remaining men able to fight less than half the number he'd begun this campaign with.
HALF of his undefeated army, lost. But, there's still hope yet! Join us next time to find out what happens to his reinforcements to the Cossacks Charles hopes yet to enlist, and most of all, to the great army of Charles himself as he and Peter finally square off at the battle of Poltava. [Outro Theme Plays].Putri LaksmiDecember 09, 2017AdminBandung Indonesia
Two houses, both alike in dignity, in fair nor-northern Europe... Wait a minute... [Extra History Intro Theme] With Poland-Lithuania out of the fight Charles XII sets his eyes on another foe: The Russian giant, Peter the Great. While Charles had run roughshod over Poland Peter had taken advantage of the moment to once again assail the Baltic provinces.
He was stopped short of his ultimate goal but Peter's efforts there were not without gain. His armies carved a path all the way to the Swedish fortress of Nyenskans which he tore down to build an even greater fortress The Peter & Paul Fortress which would serve as the cornerstone for his most ambitious project of all: St. Petersburg. He would erect a new city here one grander and more modern than anything Russia had ever seen.
This would be his gateway to the West his port that tied Russia into the economic life of Europe. It would be his new capital, on which he would spare no expense in treasure or lives. This was to be the culmination of his legacy the embodiment of all his ideas on westernizing Russia on becoming a naval power, on embracing European art and science and culture. But for that to be the case, Russia would have to succeed in holding onto these gains something that Charles XII could not abide.
Throughout 1704 and 1705 Swedish forces tried to take Peter's great fortress but time and again, they were repelled. Soon, costs started to mount, and men who that ill afford to be lost died for little gain. So Charles revamped his strategy and blockaded St. Petersburg.
While the blockade dragged on, he began marshalling his main force for a march to the east. It was at this point that Russia sent him a peace offer: in return for an armistice, Russia would give up all of their gains except for St. Petersburg and the forts connecting it to Russian territory. But Charles was having none of it.
He knew how important St. Petersburg was. Why, with his invincible army, SHOULD he give it up? So Charles marched east, braving horrible weather and dangerous crossings to move with his traditional lightning speed. As he pressed forward, Peter fell back and back each defensive line Peter's commanders had planned to entrench was taken before their men could even unpack their spades.
But even this march could not make up for the time Charles had lost trying to make Poland support his puppet king. In the years that had followed his initial victories over the Russians and the Polish-Lithuanian forces Russia had not only seized and fortified what would become St. Petersburg but reinforced it, and kept reinforcing it. Yet, the Swedish army was strong their king was able, their officers daring and intelligent.
Top members of the military thought that it would be a tough fight but that they could take St. Petersburg. They drew up plans and submitted them to the king who swore them to utmost secrecy about the plans they had concocted. And so, the officers marched, thinking their objective to be St.
Petersburg but soon, they found themselves near Minsk. Wait a minute, that wasn't on the way to St. Petersburg! Charles had marched them in a different direction and there was only one place they could be going from there. He was marching them to Moscow.
Charles's officers had told him that they were not ready that striking so deep into Russia was simply too great of a gamble. It was something the army simply wasn't prepared for. BUT, how many times before had Charles been told that something was too great a gamble? How often had he heard that something was impossible only to then achieve it himself? He had made up his mind. They would not waste their time retaking lost territories.
He would unseat Peter himself. The first two rivers they crossed with little opposition being slowed only by the fact that the retreating Russian forces burnt every bridge along the way. Tartar horsemen also harassed them continually, but this seemed a minor nuisance. They were making good time through bad country, but then, at the Vabich River they found a large enemy force barring their passage.
The position held by the Russians was daunting: the Swedes would have to traverse marshy ground to get to them and beyond that was a forest, which might hide yet more troops. But Charles saw a way. The enemy line had a gap in it along a swampy area that the Russians clearly thought was impassable. Charles personally led his army across 1,500 yards of killing ground to reach this swampy area.
At one point, his men were shoulder deep in water. The enemy line was split. The Russians tried to use numbers to heal the breach but heroic actions from the Swedish cavalry prevented any joining of Russian arms. Soon, the line began to collapse.
The crossing was theirs. Once again, the Swedes had triumphed against impossible odds. But keen observers in the army would have noted that though the Swedes emerged victorious these Russian troops were made of sterner stuff than they had been eight years back. Tactics and firm soldiering had been hammered into them since their retreat at Narva.
They would not be turning and running like that anymore. This victory left Charles's army exhausted. It would take a month of rest before he could really move them again. And during this month, Peter was not idle.
Peter stripped the land bare. He laid waste to any stretch of ground that the Swedes would have to cross and even though it was his own country and the suffering caused to his own people was immense Peter made no half-measure of it. Every grain of wheat was carted off every pasture where a horse might graze was turned to ash. There would be nothing but wasteland for the Swedes to traverse.
Thus began a time of suffering for the Swedish forces. When they resumed their march, food was scarce. And with scarce food, came disease. This victorious army began to march as defeated men with hollow eyes and weary steps.
Charles continued to rally them, but he had no real answer to this predicament. He had been counting on living off the countryside as they marched. Their supply lines were stretched beyond their limit. Many asked him to turn home, but he believed in Swedish arms.
He believed that if he could just force Peter into one decisive battle they might yet win this war. But Peter demurred. He would not give Charles the battle he wanted. And so, the Swedish marched across fields of ash seeing always in the distance villages alight candles in remembrance to Peter's uncompromising policy of starvation.
In frustration, Charles turned to his officers and asked their advice. They recommended that the army fall back to the Dnierper, and meet up with a relief force laden with supplies. But this would be tantamount to giving up the campaign, so Charles asked for other options. Reluctantly, it was suggested that the Ukraine had not been as thoroughly plundered.
It might be possible to gather supplies there and enlist the aid of friendly Cossacks. But such a move would cut the army off from any real ability to communicate with Swedish territory, or get resupplied from the empire. Still, Charles saw it as a possible path to victory where retreat offered none. His officers pleaded with him to at least wait for the relief force and their provisions, but Charles, fearing that further delays would only give Peter more time turned the army toward Ukraine immediately.
They would now retrace their steps until they could turn south walking back across the same blasted waste from which they had just come. But as summer gave way to autumn, and autumn to winter a chill set in. Then, a deep cold. Then, a freezing, bone-gnawing frost And not just any frost.
This was what is known today as The Great Frost the coldest winter Europe has experienced in 500 years. Rivers froze from the Thames all the way down to the lagoons of Venice. And this frost served Peter well. By the time the winter of 1708 and 1709 came to an end Charles had only 20,000 remaining men able to fight less than half the number he'd begun this campaign with.
HALF of his undefeated army, lost. But, there's still hope yet! Join us next time to find out what happens to his reinforcements to the Cossacks Charles hopes yet to enlist, and most of all, to the great army of Charles himself as he and Peter finally square off at the battle of Poltava. [Outro Theme Plays].
- [Narrator] Dogumentary TV producing the best breed documentaries. (Dog barking) (soul music) - My name is Gerald Antoine,
I'm a native of Jackson Mississippi but I'm an avid dog lover and an avid lover of the
European Doberman Pinscher. The breed was created for specifically to be a protection dog
for personal protection. In the 19th century the
creator of the breed, his name was Karl
Friedrich Louis Doberman.
Back in the 19th century
the tax collectors like the IRS today, they would,
back then they would knock on your door, whether
it was monthly or weekly or whatever the time period was. And he had gotten threatened so many times with people saying oh
don't come to my door, don't come to my door,
don't ask me for no money and he would get his life threatened. So, he decided to create
a breed that would not only physically intimidate them but would do some personal protection. So he made a combination of
the different type of breeds like with the Great Dane for
the speed, the Rottweiler for the size, the Terrier
for the heart, the drive.
He created this breed, he
also included the cropping of the ears for an intimidating factor. So that's what the breed,
that's how it evolved. There's a difference
between estate guardian, personal protection and
police K-9 training. There's a huge difference.
If you're talking about
an estate guardian, we're guarding his compound,
his territory, his domicile. Examples of compound guardians
or estate guardian dogs are like Bull Mastiffs, English Mastiffs, and Great Danes, those
are some of the examples of some of the compound and
an estate guardian dogs. Personal protection dog
protects the individual no matter where they're located. Whether they're going to the ATM, going to the park, going to a late night neighborhood walk,
whether they're driving.
The personal protection guards that person where ever that person is. Examples for personal
protection dog are like German Shepherds, Rottweilers
and the Doberman Pinscher. When you're talking police K-9 training a dog specifically trained
to not only probably sniff out drugs but also
to do a deterrent and catch a fleeing felon or fleeing criminal where the actual police would not go. So if they go into a
building where it's dark, the police gonna call out
K-9 because they're the ones that will go in when
the police don't wanna go into the building to
secure it or clear a building.
Some examples of the K-9 police
dogs are German Shepherds, Dutch Shepherds and Belgium Malinois. So it's a whole different
gambit of what these dogs do but the end of the day
they're trained to protect, they're trained to protect on command. (Upbeat music) The reason why I chose the
European Doberman Pinscher for personal protection is
because it had a combination of a lot of other dogs but
it didn't have some of the things that the other dogs had. It was short haired and I like that, it was smart, it's part
Greyhound so it loves to run.
I love to run and it was,
I've found to realize that I've determined and found
by research that they are very co-dependent upon their owners. They love to be around their owners. And maybe a lot of dogs
do but for me I think the personal protection
for this particular breed fit me good because it had the
right amount of size, right amount of stealth and the
right amount of intelligence. During my process of determining
what type of dog I wanted it narrowed down to some
of the most popular dogs.
Malinois, the reason why
I didn't like the Malinois because they're great dogs and
they do great work the drive is very high but some of them
lack the size that I wanted. And that's something you can't
make them, you can't make them big if he wasn't
born genetically big. The reason why I chose
the Doberman over the German Shepherd is because
obviously a lot of hair shedding. I don't wanna keep every
morning using a roller, getting a lot of hair off
of me throughout my house because I want my personal
protection dog to not only be an outside dog but an inside dog.
The Rottweiler, don't
get me wrong, I love the Rottweiler's they're
probably one of the best breeds out there compared to a Doberman's. But they tend to have the
tendency to gain weight if you don't work them out a lot. You know, they tend to
have a little bit of a hip dysplasia in some of
them as they get older. And I love the Rottweiler
because the Rottweiler shares some of the same DNA
as the Doberman Pinscher.
But I decided to stick with the Doberman because I did more research,
the Doberman Pinscher does have some genetic issues
but if you get a right one you can get a good 10 to 12 years out of the dog with minimal hip issues. And I know all of the working
lines, the show lines, and it's like you give me a
pedigree I can tell you right off the back if the pedigree
is what I would buy. A lot of people come to me and ask me how do you think about this pedigree? If I see certain lines in
there that is very similar to a lot of show lines I say
hey it's gonna be a pretty dog but I don't know about the workability. I'll be honest with you.
The reason why I decided
to protection train my dog and let me put this out there first. I am not a K-9 trainer I'm
apart of a club and I give all props and respects to the
trainers who have helped me out a long the way, Louis Williams
of Black Mask Kennel. You've got Adrianne Santino
from who did the rings for a trainer with my dog,
you've got Wolfgang Radar who's a German K-9 expert,
that's the name of his club. You've got Alvin (mumbles)
who has won national titles in personal protections
and you've got O.J., Otis James Knight from the K-9 Coach.
You know, all these guys helped me build my dogs up to what they are now. But the reason why I decided
to do personal protection is because I wanted complete
control over my dog. People assume to believe
that personal protection training is cruel and
it's not good for the dog. Well I put that in perspective
when you see these police dogs, when they come to people's aid, when you see this other
personal protection dog, when they come to their owner's aid what do you think it took
to get to that point? I put that in the same context
as these ballerina dancers.
You see how elegant they dance
and how easy they move along the floor but when you pull
their shoes off you see the deformities, the bone
breakage, you see the corns, you see the discoloration, you see all the scars on their feet. But what you see on the
outside is them dancing around, you don't see the work
it took to get in there. When you do a personal
protection you have to break them down where you let him
know you're in charge and then you build him up, you
don't break him down as a dog but you break him down
and show him you're gonna do things step by step by step. You've gotta build the
drive work, whether using ball or food or a toy, you've
gotta build the focus up.
So what I wanted to do the
reason why I personal protection training because I don't
wanna a liability on my hands. People already, when I walk
my dogs on the street in my neighborhood they
part like the Red Sea. But they don't know that I
have complete control over him. So when you're doing
personal protection not only are you obedience training
him but you're training him how to identify a threat, you're
training him when to bite, you're training him when
to release that bite.
Dogs they come into a tunnel vision and when they in a vision, a
tunnel vision nothing around them, they don't see nothing
they don't hear anything. When you do personal protection training the dogs can be able to
hear you and you only even in the heat of a battle and that's something you wanna be able to control. If he goes after a person
and that's the wrong person you wanna be able to recall him
in the middle of his pursuit without using using e-collars, without chasing behind him because
you won't catch him. He's got four leg you've only got two.
So personal protection is
really obedience training but you're giving the dog
the training and the tools in what he wants to do, he
wants to play, he wants to prey. He wants to bite, he wants to please you. And when you water him
down and not let him do the things he were
designed to do then are you really getting what you asked for? People buy Dobermans for a reason. If they want just a house hold pet they would have got a
Maltese, they would have got a Pomeranian, they
would have got a Chihuahua, something that's a lap dog,
something that is docile when it needs to be but
a %100 pet and confidant.
When you get a Doberman
understand what you may be getting into, you may get a dog. Not every Doberman is
designed for protection work. You know, not all of them
are gonna bite on command. Some of them may be scared of people, some of them may be
skittish but when you get a Doberman and you do research
on getting the right genetic bloodline, you should
know what you're getting into.
With that being said put
them into some sport work. Put them into ring sport, IPO training. You know, PSA training but
you wanna get him active where he's stimulated all the time. That way when you come home,
your yards not tore up.
You know, these are, this
is called a working breed. It wants to work. Since our last video,
Brody has achieved his IPO 2 and the handler was Alvin (mumbles). Right now we're gonna
be competing this month in December in Las Vegas for his IPO 3.
If he does well enough with the scores well, we're discussing about
doing regionals with him. Alonzo has an IPO 1, he's
right now seven and a half years old, human age is like 49. So, he's into, he's a house dog now but we still do personal protection
work to keep him active, keep his joints moving, keep his muscles and his tone right and
keep his mind right. Alonzo is, he's dual title, he's got a few obedience titles in AKC, CGC, CGCA.
He has an obedience title in a ring sport it's called a CSAU. We have a third dog his name is Bishop, he's an up an coming champion. He's an offspring of Brody. Right now Bishop has a BH,
and been working on IPO 1.
But he's a new breed and
with dogs like anything else, if you're gonna stay in this game, you have to, if you're
avid lover of the breed, whatever breed it is and
you wanna constantly do something with the breed a working line, you have to start getting
another dog for replacement. These dogs get old, you
wanna make sure they live as long as they can so you get a replacement. So, Bishop now is two years
old, he's the son of Brody. He bites hard, he's bitter sweet.
That means he's very, very
mild but when he works he cranks up and he shoots like a torpedo So right now, working
on the third dog Bishop. He's, the next time we do a video or shoot hopefully,
hopefully, we have him on. At the end of the day, I'm always gonna be into a working dog. I think the Doberman is one
of the best dogs out there.
That's my own personal perspective, a lot of people have their
own idea of what their dog is but for me, for me only I think
that the Doberman Pinscher is the ideal dog whether it's
for a small living quarters or a large two and three acre compound. No matter what dog I have
I'm gonna always do a lot personal protection because
it stimulates the dog's mind and body and it keeps them sharp. But it also it keeps me
sharp because when you're training dogs, you're
training yourself as well. And it keeps me active
and with that being said, I'm always gonna be
around people I'm always around kids and I want my dog
to be able to be acclimated to society but also be able to
work when he needs to work..Putri LaksmiDecember 08, 2017AdminBandung Indonesia
- [Narrator] Dogumentary TV producing the best breed documentaries. (Dog barking) (soul music) - My name is Gerald Antoine,
I'm a native of Jackson Mississippi but I'm an avid dog lover and an avid lover of the
European Doberman Pinscher. The breed was created for specifically to be a protection dog
for personal protection. In the 19th century the
creator of the breed, his name was Karl
Friedrich Louis Doberman.
Back in the 19th century
the tax collectors like the IRS today, they would,
back then they would knock on your door, whether
it was monthly or weekly or whatever the time period was. And he had gotten threatened so many times with people saying oh
don't come to my door, don't come to my door,
don't ask me for no money and he would get his life threatened. So, he decided to create
a breed that would not only physically intimidate them but would do some personal protection. So he made a combination of
the different type of breeds like with the Great Dane for
the speed, the Rottweiler for the size, the Terrier
for the heart, the drive.
He created this breed, he
also included the cropping of the ears for an intimidating factor. So that's what the breed,
that's how it evolved. There's a difference
between estate guardian, personal protection and
police K-9 training. There's a huge difference.
If you're talking about
an estate guardian, we're guarding his compound,
his territory, his domicile. Examples of compound guardians
or estate guardian dogs are like Bull Mastiffs, English Mastiffs, and Great Danes, those
are some of the examples of some of the compound and
an estate guardian dogs. Personal protection dog
protects the individual no matter where they're located. Whether they're going to the ATM, going to the park, going to a late night neighborhood walk,
whether they're driving.
The personal protection guards that person where ever that person is. Examples for personal
protection dog are like German Shepherds, Rottweilers
and the Doberman Pinscher. When you're talking police K-9 training a dog specifically trained
to not only probably sniff out drugs but also
to do a deterrent and catch a fleeing felon or fleeing criminal where the actual police would not go. So if they go into a
building where it's dark, the police gonna call out
K-9 because they're the ones that will go in when
the police don't wanna go into the building to
secure it or clear a building.
Some examples of the K-9 police
dogs are German Shepherds, Dutch Shepherds and Belgium Malinois. So it's a whole different
gambit of what these dogs do but the end of the day
they're trained to protect, they're trained to protect on command. (Upbeat music) The reason why I chose the
European Doberman Pinscher for personal protection is
because it had a combination of a lot of other dogs but
it didn't have some of the things that the other dogs had. It was short haired and I like that, it was smart, it's part
Greyhound so it loves to run.
I love to run and it was,
I've found to realize that I've determined and found
by research that they are very co-dependent upon their owners. They love to be around their owners. And maybe a lot of dogs
do but for me I think the personal protection
for this particular breed fit me good because it had the
right amount of size, right amount of stealth and the
right amount of intelligence. During my process of determining
what type of dog I wanted it narrowed down to some
of the most popular dogs.
Malinois, the reason why
I didn't like the Malinois because they're great dogs and
they do great work the drive is very high but some of them
lack the size that I wanted. And that's something you can't
make them, you can't make them big if he wasn't
born genetically big. The reason why I chose
the Doberman over the German Shepherd is because
obviously a lot of hair shedding. I don't wanna keep every
morning using a roller, getting a lot of hair off
of me throughout my house because I want my personal
protection dog to not only be an outside dog but an inside dog.
The Rottweiler, don't
get me wrong, I love the Rottweiler's they're
probably one of the best breeds out there compared to a Doberman's. But they tend to have the
tendency to gain weight if you don't work them out a lot. You know, they tend to
have a little bit of a hip dysplasia in some of
them as they get older. And I love the Rottweiler
because the Rottweiler shares some of the same DNA
as the Doberman Pinscher.
But I decided to stick with the Doberman because I did more research,
the Doberman Pinscher does have some genetic issues
but if you get a right one you can get a good 10 to 12 years out of the dog with minimal hip issues. And I know all of the working
lines, the show lines, and it's like you give me a
pedigree I can tell you right off the back if the pedigree
is what I would buy. A lot of people come to me and ask me how do you think about this pedigree? If I see certain lines in
there that is very similar to a lot of show lines I say
hey it's gonna be a pretty dog but I don't know about the workability. I'll be honest with you.
The reason why I decided
to protection train my dog and let me put this out there first. I am not a K-9 trainer I'm
apart of a club and I give all props and respects to the
trainers who have helped me out a long the way, Louis Williams
of Black Mask Kennel. You've got Adrianne Santino
from who did the rings for a trainer with my dog,
you've got Wolfgang Radar who's a German K-9 expert,
that's the name of his club. You've got Alvin (mumbles)
who has won national titles in personal protections
and you've got O.J., Otis James Knight from the K-9 Coach.
You know, all these guys helped me build my dogs up to what they are now. But the reason why I decided
to do personal protection is because I wanted complete
control over my dog. People assume to believe
that personal protection training is cruel and
it's not good for the dog. Well I put that in perspective
when you see these police dogs, when they come to people's aid, when you see this other
personal protection dog, when they come to their owner's aid what do you think it took
to get to that point? I put that in the same context
as these ballerina dancers.
You see how elegant they dance
and how easy they move along the floor but when you pull
their shoes off you see the deformities, the bone
breakage, you see the corns, you see the discoloration, you see all the scars on their feet. But what you see on the
outside is them dancing around, you don't see the work
it took to get in there. When you do a personal
protection you have to break them down where you let him
know you're in charge and then you build him up, you
don't break him down as a dog but you break him down
and show him you're gonna do things step by step by step. You've gotta build the
drive work, whether using ball or food or a toy, you've
gotta build the focus up.
So what I wanted to do the
reason why I personal protection training because I don't
wanna a liability on my hands. People already, when I walk
my dogs on the street in my neighborhood they
part like the Red Sea. But they don't know that I
have complete control over him. So when you're doing
personal protection not only are you obedience training
him but you're training him how to identify a threat, you're
training him when to bite, you're training him when
to release that bite.
Dogs they come into a tunnel vision and when they in a vision, a
tunnel vision nothing around them, they don't see nothing
they don't hear anything. When you do personal protection training the dogs can be able to
hear you and you only even in the heat of a battle and that's something you wanna be able to control. If he goes after a person
and that's the wrong person you wanna be able to recall him
in the middle of his pursuit without using using e-collars, without chasing behind him because
you won't catch him. He's got four leg you've only got two.
So personal protection is
really obedience training but you're giving the dog
the training and the tools in what he wants to do, he
wants to play, he wants to prey. He wants to bite, he wants to please you. And when you water him
down and not let him do the things he were
designed to do then are you really getting what you asked for? People buy Dobermans for a reason. If they want just a house hold pet they would have got a
Maltese, they would have got a Pomeranian, they
would have got a Chihuahua, something that's a lap dog,
something that is docile when it needs to be but
a %100 pet and confidant.
When you get a Doberman
understand what you may be getting into, you may get a dog. Not every Doberman is
designed for protection work. You know, not all of them
are gonna bite on command. Some of them may be scared of people, some of them may be
skittish but when you get a Doberman and you do research
on getting the right genetic bloodline, you should
know what you're getting into.
With that being said put
them into some sport work. Put them into ring sport, IPO training. You know, PSA training but
you wanna get him active where he's stimulated all the time. That way when you come home,
your yards not tore up.
You know, these are, this
is called a working breed. It wants to work. Since our last video,
Brody has achieved his IPO 2 and the handler was Alvin (mumbles). Right now we're gonna
be competing this month in December in Las Vegas for his IPO 3.
If he does well enough with the scores well, we're discussing about
doing regionals with him. Alonzo has an IPO 1, he's
right now seven and a half years old, human age is like 49. So, he's into, he's a house dog now but we still do personal protection
work to keep him active, keep his joints moving, keep his muscles and his tone right and
keep his mind right. Alonzo is, he's dual title, he's got a few obedience titles in AKC, CGC, CGCA.
He has an obedience title in a ring sport it's called a CSAU. We have a third dog his name is Bishop, he's an up an coming champion. He's an offspring of Brody. Right now Bishop has a BH,
and been working on IPO 1.
But he's a new breed and
with dogs like anything else, if you're gonna stay in this game, you have to, if you're
avid lover of the breed, whatever breed it is and
you wanna constantly do something with the breed a working line, you have to start getting
another dog for replacement. These dogs get old, you
wanna make sure they live as long as they can so you get a replacement. So, Bishop now is two years
old, he's the son of Brody. He bites hard, he's bitter sweet.
That means he's very, very
mild but when he works he cranks up and he shoots like a torpedo So right now, working
on the third dog Bishop. He's, the next time we do a video or shoot hopefully,
hopefully, we have him on. At the end of the day, I'm always gonna be into a working dog. I think the Doberman is one
of the best dogs out there.
That's my own personal perspective, a lot of people have their
own idea of what their dog is but for me, for me only I think
that the Doberman Pinscher is the ideal dog whether it's
for a small living quarters or a large two and three acre compound. No matter what dog I have
I'm gonna always do a lot personal protection because
it stimulates the dog's mind and body and it keeps them sharp. But it also it keeps me
sharp because when you're training dogs, you're
training yourself as well. And it keeps me active
and with that being said, I'm always gonna be
around people I'm always around kids and I want my dog
to be able to be acclimated to society but also be able to
work when he needs to work..
So today we finish up what I have nicknamed
the Dark Trilogy with our look at Dark Flow & the Great Attractor. We previously looked at Dark Matter in the
first episode and then Dark Energy, and as I said back when we began these three phenomena
do not have too much in common besides the word Dark. Also this week we are doing a collaboration
episode with fellow Youtuber Joe Scott, who will be looking at the Great Attractor and
you can click over to that video now, this video will just pause and open his in a new
window, or at the end of the episode when Ill bring the link up again. It will also be linked down in the video description
for those of you watching from platforms that dont allow in-video links.
If you are visiting from Joes channel and
are new here, youre encouraged to turn on the closed captions for this episode as
my speech impediment can take a little getting used to. Okay, so what is Dark Flow? As you know just about everything outside
of our galaxy and its nearest neighbors is moving away from us, and the further away
they are the faster they are moving away. Indeed, as we discussed in the Dark Energy
video that expansion seems to be accelerating too, so that it looks like a trillion years
down the road almost all the Universe we can reach will be within a million or so light
years of use even though the Observable Universe will be trillions of light years wide and
most of what is in the currently Observable Universe will have sailed over the horizon
leaving us alone. The speed things move away from us from the
Hubble Expansion is proportional to their distance from us.
Get twice as far away and the velocity is
twice as high, so anything already at galactic distance moving away from us will just keep
moving away faster and faster. But things do not have an exact velocity based
solely on their distance from us, much like everything else they move relative to each
other so two galaxies nearby each other might be moving away from us at a rate of 1000 kilometers
a second but one is only moving away at say, 990 km/s and the other at 1010 km/s. We would expect that. Same the moons around Mars or Jupiter keep
pace with their planets but might be moving toward us a bit or away from us a bit while
performing their own orbits.
Galaxies tend to exist in clumps too, so it
is no surprise some might be moving toward us or away from us, relative to their cluster
even if that cluster is receding away from us. Local motions, we would expect them all to
average out. Indeed we almost have to since our main way
to determine the distance of very distant objects is to look at how fast they are moving
away from us by their redshift. If we saw those two galaxies form a moment
ago, we might not even realize at first they were near each other, just in the same direction,
because we are guessing their distance from their velocities and theyre not the same.
It can be quite difficult to look at groups
of galaxies and figure out what each ones velocity relative to that area is, what is
called their peculiar velocity. In this sense we use the word peculiar not
to mean strange or odd, well get to the strange and odd motion in a moment, but in
its other meaning, of something belonging exclusively to. In fact that is the original meaning, and
it meaning strange or odd came later. Much as I might say that cliff diving is a
hobby I consider peculiar to those sorts of people who like their hobbies suicidally reckless,
and how we might say those people are a bit strange, and so peculiar in that way too.
But I digress, we use the term peculiar velocity
to refer to a things velocities when we cut away the component from Hubble Expansion so
we can talk about how group of galaxies move relative to each other. Now we would expect that to average out to
zero. So it came as a bit of a surprise in 2008
when we noticed a lot of galaxies seemed to be moving, in terms of peculiar velocity,
in a specific direction. They were flowing that way for no apparent
reason, presumably form a source of gravity we could not see.
This gave us the term Dark Flow. Now two things came up right away. First the motion is headed toward a place
we called the Great Attractor, having already noticed all the way back in the 1970s that
galaxies in our supercluster were drifting that way. Irritatingly the Great Attractor happens to
be in the Zone of Avoidance, whose somewhat dramatic sounding name probably helped add
the mystery value with the public.
Its a huge chunk of the night sky taking
up fully 20% of it. The Zone of Avoidance sounds like a place
you would expect to be where space pirates hung out or maybe some evil galactic empire. It used to be called the Zone of Few Nebulae
which isnt much better because now it sounds like some empty place Cthulu would go for
naps. However Nebulae is what we used to call other
galaxies, as I mentioned back in the Dark Matter episode, we confused them with Nebula
in our own galaxy and didnt realize how far away and huge they were.
This was a zone of the sky in which few were
found. You could also consider the Zone of Avoidance
the second zone of avoidance, since telescopes can rotate in which way but you usually want
to avoid pointing them down at ground. If you dont avoid pointing your telescope
at ground you wont see many stars. The Zone of Audience is just a term that refers
to the chunk of the sky our galaxy occupies and all the stars and dust make it quite difficult
to see distant galaxies on the other side of it.
Hence you avoid looking at that zone if you
want to study distant galaxies. In that respect it isnt too surprising
that the Great Attractor lies in that direction, 20% of the Universe lies in that direction
after all. Now when this first got noticed back in the
70s the assumption was that there was probably a lot matter we couldnt see over there. Some folks took We cant see it to
imply it must be some giant super-colossal black hole, but again the lack of visibility
is because our galaxy is in the way.
The main assumption was there was just a ton
of galaxies in that direction. That was still interesting at the time because
we had still been assuming the universe was pretty evenly spread, not all clumped together
into lines and walls and huge voids. Whichever the case, as the years rolled by
there were arguments about the method and how much mass was actually there, which was
kind of difficult to rigorously measure with us not being able to see the stuff closest
to it to take measurements either. Its estimated to be around 200 million
light years away, which is very far away though also quite close on the scale of the Observable
Universe.
The observable Universe is a couple hundred
times wider than the volume encompassing our galaxy and the Great Attractor and several
million times bigger in terms of mass and volume. In 2008 though we got new data and we saw
that there seemed to be a much larger volume of space moving towards this spot. For a while some were even thinking the whole
Universe might be headed in that direction and that the Great attractor might not be
some spot a couple hundred million light years away but actually billions of light years
away, possibly outside the Observable Universe. And thats allowable too.
The Observable Universe is not the whole Universe,
just those parts we can see, and we have no idea how big the whole Universe is, it may
indeed be infinite, it may just be a little bigger than the Observable part, but the main
assumption is that it is at least much, much larger than what we can see. If the Universe didnt start off very evenly
spread there could have been a super huge chunk of mass just over the Cosmological horizon
in some direction causing a drift. Now gravity does move at the speed of light,
for some reason I still hear folks so it is instantaneous and I have no idea where that
comes from. Though amusingly if you think of gravity as
being made of gravitons, in the same light is made of photons, that does raise some eyebrows
about how gravity itself escapes from black holes.
So no mass thats already fled over the
cosmological horizon is exerting force on us anymore. The Cosmological Horizon is the imaginary
line where space is expanding faster than the speed of light so no light from galaxies
beyond that every reaches us again, and also no gravity. That doesnt mean it wasnt pulling on
us in the past or isnt pulling still on things nearer to it, causing a net drift,
or flow. Now this stirred a lot of speculation and
ideas but before you go off contemplating those, not only was Dark Flow at the Universal
scale never particularly accepted, it more or less got skewered in 2013 when we got the
data from the ESAs Planck Space Telescope.
It should no evidence of dark flow on the
Universal scale. This does not mean Dark Flow was debunked,
because it is just a term for large scale flow of galaxies in some direction where that
direction cant be seen well enough to get too specific about the cause. And by cause I mean the source of the gravity,
Im not implying some weird new force or phenomena. It would not be limited to just our area of
the Universe and the Great Attractor but by and large those flows at very distant location
wont be dark to us since we wont be sitting in the middle of the flow with its
center obscured by our galaxy being in the way.
At the same time I do not want to imply this
is not a mystery. Or that it is not important. It is both. In fact in recent years you may have heard
the emergence of the term the Laniakea Supercluster.
This is our Supercluster of galaxies that
we live in. You might not be familiar with it because
we used to call our Supercluster the Virgo Supercluster, but the emerging evidence would
seem to point to it just being a decent sized chunk of a larger construct including a few
more super cluster all center around the Great Attractor. The Laniakea Supercluster, our new supercluster,
centered on the Great Attractor, is half a billion light years across and contains a
total mass of around 10,000 Trillion times our own suns mass. Thats many thousands of galaxies and many
hundreds of galaxy clusters.
The name derives from Hawaiian and means Immense
Heaven, presumably because it is impolite to name everything in Greek, although more
likely because we are running out of Greek words we havent already used for something
else. Now when we say things are moving toward it,
they actually are not. They are mostly moving away from it but not
as fast as they should be. As a rule Galactic Supercluster are too far
spread out not to be ripped apart by the expansion of the Universe, regular galactic clusters
are not, so our neighboring galaxies ought to stay with us till the end of time and eventually
merge with us.
Which they do all the time anyway, this weeks
big science news was astronomers discovering there were ten times as many galaxies as previously
thought and I got messaged dozens of times about it by folks wondering if it through
dark matter and dark energy into the trash can. It did not, this is an example of way too
much hype in science journalism. We already knew our galaxy like many of the
bigger modern galaxies gobbled up tons of smaller neighbors. Our galaxy is a big cannibal gobbling up its
neighbors, in fact its probably not our galaxy as it looks like we originated with
the late Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy.
Everybody knows about the Large and Small
Magellanic clouds, our two dwarf satellite galaxies, but as we learn more we can see
the gutted carcasses of an awful lot of them floating around in us or near us, over 50
that have been identified though some are disputed and there could be more we ate so
long ago we cant see the traces. The big new discovery as a big discovery,
but it was of the finally some proof variety, not Oh My God our theories are
in ruins variety. They found a lot of dwarf galaxies when they
looked far away in space and thus also far back in time. It was confirmation of what was expected,
that there were a lot of smaller dimmer galaxies in the ancient universe most of which have
merged together in modern times.
They are going to keep merging too as the
eons meander along, till you dont have galactic cluster anymore, just single big
galaxies, bigger than now, floating alone in the void with huge and ever-increasing
distances to their neighboring galaxies. This is the confusion we see with the Great
Attractor, again it isnt that all these galaxies are moving toward it, as I said,
they are not. It is probably not moving toward itself either
since it is probably just a bunch of galaxies maybe slightly more densely packed than normal,
or maybe just in the rough center of a fairly large supercluster. Things are moving away from it, but slower
than they should be because there is a lot of gravity working against the Hubble Expansion
presumably caused by Dark Energy.
It does not necessarily mean this will all
be torn apart though, just that if left to itself it will be. The Great Attractor has become a popular place
in science fiction to have some mega-civilization that dwarfs even the galaxy-spanning Kardashev
3 civilizations we discussed in the recent episode on the Kardashev scale. As I mentioned way back in the Black Hole
Farming episode, Civilizations at the End of Time, the way we predict the Universe to
look in a few trillion years will almost certainly not be what it looks like if we ever get out
and start colonizing other solar systems or anyone else has. And as I mentioned in the Kardashev Scale
episode, you can move galaxies, same as you can move stars, something we showed in the
Shkadov Thrusters episode was very effort intensive but not actually very high tech
at all.
If it turns out we have not only this whole
galaxy to ourselves but the whole supercluster, it might make sense for us to race out ahead
of the expansion and start shoving galaxies back toward us. We are not at the center of either our traditional
Virgo Supercluster or the larger Laniakea Supercluster we think is centered around the
Great Attractor, but with Dark Flow helping bind these things together it makes it a lot
easier to push them to keep them together. So rather than a sphere of galaxies around
our own being rescued from Hubble Expansion you might see such a sphere centered more
around the Great Attractor, especially if theres a handful of other civilizations
living in the area who might want to team up and would probably be pretty evenly distributed
throughout it. That is a case where teaming up is good since
youd end up with a larger overall number of galaxies than the combined number each
would get working on its own.
But if we have the place all to ourselves
we might as well grab as much as we can, and in the same way we might expect a galactic
empire to re-center itself from Earth to some place a bit more central to use as a capitol
you might see the same thing happen for the supercluster and get some multi-galactic empires
capitol located in the Great Attractor controlling tens of thousands of galaxies. I dont think that is terribly likely, especially
without at least some form of faster than light communication if not travel, but I always
seem to be in a minority in thinking FTL is not in the cards. So good fuel for science fiction authors perhaps,
beyond the Zone of Avoidance, deep inside the Great Attractor, lies the seat of an ancient
empire ruling over 10,000 galaxies. So thats Dark Flow, the mysterious motion
of galaxies toward the Great Attractor, and it is still a mystery but hopefully less of
one right now.
That will also close out our look at Dark
Matter, Dark Energy, and Dark Flow. Next week we will be coming back much closer
to home for a look at colonizing the outer solar system and the week after that we will
be taking a look at some more astronomy to demystify a lot of the terms and concepts
like we did today, and look at some of the more bizarre stars, in the Stellar Compendium. Id like to thank Joe Scott from Answers
with Joe for teaming up with me on this topic and if youd like to hear some more fun
stuff about the Great Attractor you can head on over to his channel to see that now, using
the in-video link or the one in the episode description. And you can also come by the Facebook Group
or sub-reddit, both titles Science and Futurism with Isaac Arthur, to talk with others but
some of these concepts.
You can also try out any of the episodes and
playlists on this channel or over at the website, IsaacArthur.Net. Again, next week is Colonizing the Outer Solar
System, and until then, thanks for watching, and have a great day!.Putri LaksmiDecember 07, 2017AdminBandung Indonesia
So today we finish up what I have nicknamed
the Dark Trilogy with our look at Dark Flow & the Great Attractor. We previously looked at Dark Matter in the
first episode and then Dark Energy, and as I said back when we began these three phenomena
do not have too much in common besides the word Dark. Also this week we are doing a collaboration
episode with fellow Youtuber Joe Scott, who will be looking at the Great Attractor and
you can click over to that video now, this video will just pause and open his in a new
window, or at the end of the episode when Ill bring the link up again. It will also be linked down in the video description
for those of you watching from platforms that dont allow in-video links.
If you are visiting from Joes channel and
are new here, youre encouraged to turn on the closed captions for this episode as
my speech impediment can take a little getting used to. Okay, so what is Dark Flow? As you know just about everything outside
of our galaxy and its nearest neighbors is moving away from us, and the further away
they are the faster they are moving away. Indeed, as we discussed in the Dark Energy
video that expansion seems to be accelerating too, so that it looks like a trillion years
down the road almost all the Universe we can reach will be within a million or so light
years of use even though the Observable Universe will be trillions of light years wide and
most of what is in the currently Observable Universe will have sailed over the horizon
leaving us alone. The speed things move away from us from the
Hubble Expansion is proportional to their distance from us.
Get twice as far away and the velocity is
twice as high, so anything already at galactic distance moving away from us will just keep
moving away faster and faster. But things do not have an exact velocity based
solely on their distance from us, much like everything else they move relative to each
other so two galaxies nearby each other might be moving away from us at a rate of 1000 kilometers
a second but one is only moving away at say, 990 km/s and the other at 1010 km/s. We would expect that. Same the moons around Mars or Jupiter keep
pace with their planets but might be moving toward us a bit or away from us a bit while
performing their own orbits.
Galaxies tend to exist in clumps too, so it
is no surprise some might be moving toward us or away from us, relative to their cluster
even if that cluster is receding away from us. Local motions, we would expect them all to
average out. Indeed we almost have to since our main way
to determine the distance of very distant objects is to look at how fast they are moving
away from us by their redshift. If we saw those two galaxies form a moment
ago, we might not even realize at first they were near each other, just in the same direction,
because we are guessing their distance from their velocities and theyre not the same.
It can be quite difficult to look at groups
of galaxies and figure out what each ones velocity relative to that area is, what is
called their peculiar velocity. In this sense we use the word peculiar not
to mean strange or odd, well get to the strange and odd motion in a moment, but in
its other meaning, of something belonging exclusively to. In fact that is the original meaning, and
it meaning strange or odd came later. Much as I might say that cliff diving is a
hobby I consider peculiar to those sorts of people who like their hobbies suicidally reckless,
and how we might say those people are a bit strange, and so peculiar in that way too.
But I digress, we use the term peculiar velocity
to refer to a things velocities when we cut away the component from Hubble Expansion so
we can talk about how group of galaxies move relative to each other. Now we would expect that to average out to
zero. So it came as a bit of a surprise in 2008
when we noticed a lot of galaxies seemed to be moving, in terms of peculiar velocity,
in a specific direction. They were flowing that way for no apparent
reason, presumably form a source of gravity we could not see.
This gave us the term Dark Flow. Now two things came up right away. First the motion is headed toward a place
we called the Great Attractor, having already noticed all the way back in the 1970s that
galaxies in our supercluster were drifting that way. Irritatingly the Great Attractor happens to
be in the Zone of Avoidance, whose somewhat dramatic sounding name probably helped add
the mystery value with the public.
Its a huge chunk of the night sky taking
up fully 20% of it. The Zone of Avoidance sounds like a place
you would expect to be where space pirates hung out or maybe some evil galactic empire. It used to be called the Zone of Few Nebulae
which isnt much better because now it sounds like some empty place Cthulu would go for
naps. However Nebulae is what we used to call other
galaxies, as I mentioned back in the Dark Matter episode, we confused them with Nebula
in our own galaxy and didnt realize how far away and huge they were.
This was a zone of the sky in which few were
found. You could also consider the Zone of Avoidance
the second zone of avoidance, since telescopes can rotate in which way but you usually want
to avoid pointing them down at ground. If you dont avoid pointing your telescope
at ground you wont see many stars. The Zone of Audience is just a term that refers
to the chunk of the sky our galaxy occupies and all the stars and dust make it quite difficult
to see distant galaxies on the other side of it.
Hence you avoid looking at that zone if you
want to study distant galaxies. In that respect it isnt too surprising
that the Great Attractor lies in that direction, 20% of the Universe lies in that direction
after all. Now when this first got noticed back in the
70s the assumption was that there was probably a lot matter we couldnt see over there. Some folks took We cant see it to
imply it must be some giant super-colossal black hole, but again the lack of visibility
is because our galaxy is in the way.
The main assumption was there was just a ton
of galaxies in that direction. That was still interesting at the time because
we had still been assuming the universe was pretty evenly spread, not all clumped together
into lines and walls and huge voids. Whichever the case, as the years rolled by
there were arguments about the method and how much mass was actually there, which was
kind of difficult to rigorously measure with us not being able to see the stuff closest
to it to take measurements either. Its estimated to be around 200 million
light years away, which is very far away though also quite close on the scale of the Observable
Universe.
The observable Universe is a couple hundred
times wider than the volume encompassing our galaxy and the Great Attractor and several
million times bigger in terms of mass and volume. In 2008 though we got new data and we saw
that there seemed to be a much larger volume of space moving towards this spot. For a while some were even thinking the whole
Universe might be headed in that direction and that the Great attractor might not be
some spot a couple hundred million light years away but actually billions of light years
away, possibly outside the Observable Universe. And thats allowable too.
The Observable Universe is not the whole Universe,
just those parts we can see, and we have no idea how big the whole Universe is, it may
indeed be infinite, it may just be a little bigger than the Observable part, but the main
assumption is that it is at least much, much larger than what we can see. If the Universe didnt start off very evenly
spread there could have been a super huge chunk of mass just over the Cosmological horizon
in some direction causing a drift. Now gravity does move at the speed of light,
for some reason I still hear folks so it is instantaneous and I have no idea where that
comes from. Though amusingly if you think of gravity as
being made of gravitons, in the same light is made of photons, that does raise some eyebrows
about how gravity itself escapes from black holes.
So no mass thats already fled over the
cosmological horizon is exerting force on us anymore. The Cosmological Horizon is the imaginary
line where space is expanding faster than the speed of light so no light from galaxies
beyond that every reaches us again, and also no gravity. That doesnt mean it wasnt pulling on
us in the past or isnt pulling still on things nearer to it, causing a net drift,
or flow. Now this stirred a lot of speculation and
ideas but before you go off contemplating those, not only was Dark Flow at the Universal
scale never particularly accepted, it more or less got skewered in 2013 when we got the
data from the ESAs Planck Space Telescope.
It should no evidence of dark flow on the
Universal scale. This does not mean Dark Flow was debunked,
because it is just a term for large scale flow of galaxies in some direction where that
direction cant be seen well enough to get too specific about the cause. And by cause I mean the source of the gravity,
Im not implying some weird new force or phenomena. It would not be limited to just our area of
the Universe and the Great Attractor but by and large those flows at very distant location
wont be dark to us since we wont be sitting in the middle of the flow with its
center obscured by our galaxy being in the way.
At the same time I do not want to imply this
is not a mystery. Or that it is not important. It is both. In fact in recent years you may have heard
the emergence of the term the Laniakea Supercluster.
This is our Supercluster of galaxies that
we live in. You might not be familiar with it because
we used to call our Supercluster the Virgo Supercluster, but the emerging evidence would
seem to point to it just being a decent sized chunk of a larger construct including a few
more super cluster all center around the Great Attractor. The Laniakea Supercluster, our new supercluster,
centered on the Great Attractor, is half a billion light years across and contains a
total mass of around 10,000 Trillion times our own suns mass. Thats many thousands of galaxies and many
hundreds of galaxy clusters.
The name derives from Hawaiian and means Immense
Heaven, presumably because it is impolite to name everything in Greek, although more
likely because we are running out of Greek words we havent already used for something
else. Now when we say things are moving toward it,
they actually are not. They are mostly moving away from it but not
as fast as they should be. As a rule Galactic Supercluster are too far
spread out not to be ripped apart by the expansion of the Universe, regular galactic clusters
are not, so our neighboring galaxies ought to stay with us till the end of time and eventually
merge with us.
Which they do all the time anyway, this weeks
big science news was astronomers discovering there were ten times as many galaxies as previously
thought and I got messaged dozens of times about it by folks wondering if it through
dark matter and dark energy into the trash can. It did not, this is an example of way too
much hype in science journalism. We already knew our galaxy like many of the
bigger modern galaxies gobbled up tons of smaller neighbors. Our galaxy is a big cannibal gobbling up its
neighbors, in fact its probably not our galaxy as it looks like we originated with
the late Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy.
Everybody knows about the Large and Small
Magellanic clouds, our two dwarf satellite galaxies, but as we learn more we can see
the gutted carcasses of an awful lot of them floating around in us or near us, over 50
that have been identified though some are disputed and there could be more we ate so
long ago we cant see the traces. The big new discovery as a big discovery,
but it was of the finally some proof variety, not Oh My God our theories are
in ruins variety. They found a lot of dwarf galaxies when they
looked far away in space and thus also far back in time. It was confirmation of what was expected,
that there were a lot of smaller dimmer galaxies in the ancient universe most of which have
merged together in modern times.
They are going to keep merging too as the
eons meander along, till you dont have galactic cluster anymore, just single big
galaxies, bigger than now, floating alone in the void with huge and ever-increasing
distances to their neighboring galaxies. This is the confusion we see with the Great
Attractor, again it isnt that all these galaxies are moving toward it, as I said,
they are not. It is probably not moving toward itself either
since it is probably just a bunch of galaxies maybe slightly more densely packed than normal,
or maybe just in the rough center of a fairly large supercluster. Things are moving away from it, but slower
than they should be because there is a lot of gravity working against the Hubble Expansion
presumably caused by Dark Energy.
It does not necessarily mean this will all
be torn apart though, just that if left to itself it will be. The Great Attractor has become a popular place
in science fiction to have some mega-civilization that dwarfs even the galaxy-spanning Kardashev
3 civilizations we discussed in the recent episode on the Kardashev scale. As I mentioned way back in the Black Hole
Farming episode, Civilizations at the End of Time, the way we predict the Universe to
look in a few trillion years will almost certainly not be what it looks like if we ever get out
and start colonizing other solar systems or anyone else has. And as I mentioned in the Kardashev Scale
episode, you can move galaxies, same as you can move stars, something we showed in the
Shkadov Thrusters episode was very effort intensive but not actually very high tech
at all.
If it turns out we have not only this whole
galaxy to ourselves but the whole supercluster, it might make sense for us to race out ahead
of the expansion and start shoving galaxies back toward us. We are not at the center of either our traditional
Virgo Supercluster or the larger Laniakea Supercluster we think is centered around the
Great Attractor, but with Dark Flow helping bind these things together it makes it a lot
easier to push them to keep them together. So rather than a sphere of galaxies around
our own being rescued from Hubble Expansion you might see such a sphere centered more
around the Great Attractor, especially if theres a handful of other civilizations
living in the area who might want to team up and would probably be pretty evenly distributed
throughout it. That is a case where teaming up is good since
youd end up with a larger overall number of galaxies than the combined number each
would get working on its own.
But if we have the place all to ourselves
we might as well grab as much as we can, and in the same way we might expect a galactic
empire to re-center itself from Earth to some place a bit more central to use as a capitol
you might see the same thing happen for the supercluster and get some multi-galactic empires
capitol located in the Great Attractor controlling tens of thousands of galaxies. I dont think that is terribly likely, especially
without at least some form of faster than light communication if not travel, but I always
seem to be in a minority in thinking FTL is not in the cards. So good fuel for science fiction authors perhaps,
beyond the Zone of Avoidance, deep inside the Great Attractor, lies the seat of an ancient
empire ruling over 10,000 galaxies. So thats Dark Flow, the mysterious motion
of galaxies toward the Great Attractor, and it is still a mystery but hopefully less of
one right now.
That will also close out our look at Dark
Matter, Dark Energy, and Dark Flow. Next week we will be coming back much closer
to home for a look at colonizing the outer solar system and the week after that we will
be taking a look at some more astronomy to demystify a lot of the terms and concepts
like we did today, and look at some of the more bizarre stars, in the Stellar Compendium. Id like to thank Joe Scott from Answers
with Joe for teaming up with me on this topic and if youd like to hear some more fun
stuff about the Great Attractor you can head on over to his channel to see that now, using
the in-video link or the one in the episode description. And you can also come by the Facebook Group
or sub-reddit, both titles Science and Futurism with Isaac Arthur, to talk with others but
some of these concepts.
You can also try out any of the episodes and
playlists on this channel or over at the website, IsaacArthur.Net. Again, next week is Colonizing the Outer Solar
System, and until then, thanks for watching, and have a great day!.
I'm Indy Neidell and here is a Great War Special DICE and Electronic Arts announced that the
next installment of their video game series Battlefield will be set in World War 1. Now,
since the first trailer was published, thousands of people have joined our channel, which is
cool. And to welcome all the new fans and the older ones who are excited for the game
too, we decided to make an extra episode analyzing the trailer. 0:06 - 0:07
What do we see? A German soldier beats a British or US soldier with a makeshift trench club.
The background is hazy and muddy and we see observation balloons and tree stumps.
Close Quarters Combat was very common in trench
warfare, and the soldiers often used improvised weapons. The German Soldier: He is wearing a typical
German gas mask - seems to the be M1917 model. Instead of the standard German Stahlhelm,
he seems to wear a metal (skull-) cap of some sort. Maybe the Stirnpanzer was the inspiration
for this.
It was part of the armour that was issued to Machine Gun sentries. The other
part was what we call lobster armour. He is also wearing the full marching gear Which is kind of odd to wear in the
field. We see some patch insignia on the shoulder - this is not in line with actual uniform
style.
One explanation could be that this is for the Squad insignia in the game. You
can see the red finish on his collar as well, which is the colour of the pioneers or the
infantry. In the close up you see German leather ammo and gear pouches. Looks like hes wearing
a scarf too.
The British or American soldier: He seems
to wear the SBR Small Box Respirator. And the typical British canvas belt and ammo pouches.
And what looks like a trench coat with a turned up collar. This is interesting: When he turns
around you can see a Geballte Ladung on his back - charges of multiple German Stielhandgranaten bound together. These were used in WW1 to penetrate weaker armours before real anti tank weapons were available.
The Battlefield: The tree stumps, the mud,
and the barbed wire are straight from the classic images of the Western Front. You can
see some ruins too. And at least 5 observation balloons. There are also Flak shells exploding
in the air.
0:08 - 0:12
The next scene is set in the desert and you can see a lonely horse rider. The area covering
Egypt, the Arabian Peninsula, Mesopotamia, Persia, Palestine, and up to Anatolia was
an important theatre of World War 1 once the Ottoman Empire entered the war. Horses were
used to cover the distances, of course, as were camels. The rider is wearing more traditional gear
including ammo bandoliers as a belt.
And she is notably pulling a sabre. The stirrup-hilted
handle is actually more common for European or British Hussars. It definitely doesnt
look like the typical scimitar that was common in the area. But since the British were heavily
involved in the the Middle East, this would possibly be available, though sabres were
status things and not often lost or given away.
In the close up we can see that the women
riding the horse has facial tattoos resembling bedouin tribes. The tribes were notably persuaded
to rise up against the Ottomans in the Arab Revolt with support of the British, notably
T.E. Lawrence aka. Lawrence of Arabia.
0:13 - 0:14
The next scene seems to cover aerial combat on the Western Front again. In the foreground
we see the tail gunner of a plane which might be a Sopwith Strutter 1 . Hes firing
the aerial Lewis Gun, according to our friend Othais who made a video about the guns seen
in the trailer. The insignia on the wing indicates that this is a plane from the Royal Flying
Corps, the predecessor of the Royal Air Force.
In the background you can see observation
balloons again, there is a river and cutting through the battlefield and on the left you
can actually see some untouched landscape not yet consumed by trench warfare. This is
a nice idea, however the actual distances would be much greater, since behind the trenches
you had supplies, maybe even 1 or 2 more trench systems and so forth. In the far back and in the beginning of the
shot you can see the famous red Fokker Dr 1 triplane as flown by the Red Baron. Of course
the plane in this colour is very noticeable, but Richthofens Squadron was called the
Flying Circus because the planes all were painted in different colours.
Furthermore,
not all pilots choose to do this at all. The scene covers another Plane which looks like
another Sopwith Strutter too. 0:14 - 0:18
This seems to be the same scene again but now we are on the ground. The Sopwith is flying
above and more planes can be seen in the background.
You can also spot the fields and the river
again. But of course the interesting part is the
foreground here where 7 soldiers are fighting. Because of the contrast, we cannot make out
a lot of details. But the 2nd and 3rd soldier from the right are engaged in close combat
again.
This time the German soldier is wearing the M1916 Stahlhelm and his weapon of choice
is the Grabenspaten. According to Erich Maria Remarque in All Quiet On The Western Front
German soldiers used this instead of bayonet because the bayonet had the tendency to get
stuck in the rib cage of your enemy. The spade however, was so sharp that you could cut through
the whole body. The German soldier is also wearing crutches on his back.
Maybe he is
a medic. Of course no one would carry those in a trench assault but this is probably about
recognising the medic in the game. The soldier getting hit with the spade seems
to be an American soldier, at least he is carrying the Winchester 1897 Shotgun. He is
also carrying the bayonet holster which is an odd combo with the shotgun.
There is of
course the famous story that the Germans considered this weapon to barbaric in combat and protested
in 1918. Same thing happened with Dum Dum Bullets. In the background of this scene you can see
either smoke or gas. A variety of chemical agents were used during the war.
We made a
whole special episode about them. 0:18 - 0:20
The next scene is again a German Fokker Dr. 1 Triplane chasing another plane through the
canyons. He is firing a German IMG08/15.
The Fokker Dr. 1 Never flew in the Middle East
and certainly not the Red Baron who was on the Eastern and Western Front. Airplanes in
the Middle East had more of an reconnaissance role, but there were Ottoman Aces too. 0:20 - 0:23
We are switching back to the Western Front and see a plane crashing into a windmill.
The fields in Flanders and Northern France probably had those at some point.
Its odd
that this one is still standing though and hasnt been pulverised by artillery. The
soldier in the foreground seems to be British or American again. You can see his backpack
and spade quite well. The soldier on the left is a bit puzzling.
From the colours and gear,
it seems to be a German soldier. Contrary to the other soldiers seen so far, he is very
lightly equipped with a spade, a bayonet, a gas mask container on the back. He is not
even wearing a helmet but the German Feldmtze without a visor which means he is not an officer. 0:24
We see a quick shot of a tank driver.
Yes, the tanks were controlled by levers. 0:25-0:26
The desert again: In the quick camera pan, we see a British Mark IV tank and a soldier
stumbling. He might be Ottoman actually, since a few thousand M1916 helmets were issued to
the Ottoman Army. After the pan another Mark IV appears accompanied by a soldier wearing
a German anti tank rifle, the T-Gewehr.
But the soldier seem to be British judging from,
for example, the puttees. Does that make sense? Well, yes. Whole books have been written about
foreign rifles in the armies and it was common to try to incorporate captured equipment into
your own army. There were limits to that of course.
The gear of this soldier is a bit
puzzling to me, the hood and shoulder patches dont ring any bell. We see some soldiers charging on horses and
being attacked by a biplane. The soldiers have different head gear from scarves to helmets
and goggles. Pretty sure that that they would not attack a tank in a frontal assault.
Actually,
we only found references to a few Mark I tanks serving in the Battle of Gaza. Other lighter
vehicles were used in the desert though. 0:27 - 0:28
This shot is a bit puzzling. Othais says the person we see is firing the classic Colt M1911.
Other than that you cannot really see anything.
The architecture of the building could be
as much Paris as it could be Berlin so who knows where it is. 0:28 - 0:30
Then theres a new scenario. Its a forest with a ruin in the back. There was heavy fighting
in places like the Argonnes, so this is not unusual.
The character whose Point of View
we see is carrying a Lewis Gun. The important thing of course is the green cloud in the
centre which might be chlorine gas, or chlorine mixed with phosgene, called Green Cross. While
the soldier on the left is already collapsing, the one standing right in the cloud seems
to be fine. On the right side a heavy gun is firing.
This
could be the French 75 mm field gun which was widely used during World War 1 and was
also used to deliver gas shells. It was also exported to other nations. 0:30 - 0:31
That armour is ridiculous. There were experiments with body armours and masks and stuff like
that, but they looked a lot clunkier than that.
The Germans had the lobster armour for
their sentries but it was impractical for movement. Knowing the materials available
at the time, the mask would also be pretty heavy. We dont know what kind of machine
gun hes firing. But it seems a bit out of place.
The soldiers that get shot by that guy are
Italian soldiers in a valley of the Isonzo Front. Othais says that the weapons models
dont really check out, yet, but it might be placeholders or unfinished designs. The
Italian soldiers are wearing their version of the Adrian helmet and standard uniforms
with pouches. Interestingly, the soldier in the front seems to have a axe or ice axe Benito Mussolini was a big
fan of knives, for example, and the Italian elite storm troops, the Arditi, also used
them a lot.
The axes were the same tools they used to dig shelters into the rock. The soldier
is also wearing the grenade bundle on his back. In the background one of the soldiers is equipped
with a flame thrower. Some pictures of flamethrowers we see in World War 1 show that these
were used by teams, but there were smaller versions too that could be carried by one
soldier.
0:32 - 0:34
We are in the air above the Italian front again. Apart from the planes and balloons
we already know, the terrain is very interesting. It seems more open than the other scenes and
we can see a lot of height differences too. That is of course completely in line with
the actual battlefields of that front.
In the beginning there was a stalemate there
too but with later offensives the front was much more dynamic than you might think, especially
in 1917 when Erwin Rommel fought there, for example. 0:35 - 0:38
The shot opens with a Mark IV tank again and then we are in the trenches for the first
time. These seem to be British soldiers which wear Brodie Helmets, the normal uniforms and
equipment, as well as the Lee Enfield .303 Rifles - one of the most recognisable rifles
of the war. Some soldiers have their bayonets mounted.
One soldier is preparing to go over
the top, he is wearing a handgun and just a cap. The surrounding area is still pretty
much in tact, you can see trees. The tank blasting over the trench is actually right
because thats what they were invented for. 0:40
Flamethrower guy again.
You can see his protective gear pretty well. 0:41- 0:42
An armoured train! The Germans used those at Verdun and the Belgians also had some.
They also played an important role in Eastern Europe in the different wars that broke out
there after World War 1. The ship firing the broadside appears to be
a an Iron Duke class battleship. People usually think that the navies didnt play a big
role in World War 1, but when you follow our show, you know that there were several naval
battles, most notably the Battle of Jutland.
The planes attacking the ship in the next
shot are not seaplanes which is what would have been used in open waters. Airplane carriers
in the classical sense were not used in World War 1, but ships could carry seaplanes very
well. 0:43
The plane crashing into the ground seems to be a German Gotha G.I. Bomber.
0:46
We are in a British or American artillery position. The guns firing look like 9.2 Inch
howitzers. The shells lying around like that are a nice detail because thats actually
how it looked like during a battle. Artillery caused 75% of all casualties in the entire
war and was enormously important in all theatres.
In the beginning it was less focused, but
throughout the war more sophisticated tactics like the creeping barrage were invented. 0:49
We can briefly see a side mounted scope for a German Gewehr 98. Sniping or Sharpshooting
was a part of striking fear and terror on the other side. Snipers would pick targets
in the other trenches which were sometimes not very far away.
0:55
The final shot of the trailer is an iconic German Zeppelin. The Germans used them for
tactical bombing on the Western and Eastern Front as well as for recon. They were not
very precise for bombing at all, but the Germans counted on the psychological effect. Contrary
to popular belief, these could not be shot down easily because they flew higher than
most fighters or artillery shells and a simple hole in the skin wouldnt do much harm since
they had many separate gas compartments.
Later on more sophisticated tactics were developed
like incendiary bullets. We got asked a lot how accurate the trailer is in historical terms. Its difficult
to say. Some of the scenes feature some unusual or experimental gear and some weapons are
carried by soldiers from the other side.
Overall, it is an entertainment product foremost and
you probably wont get an accurate depiction of the horrors of this war. However, the trailer
already shows a lot of aspects that are usually forgotten when talking about this war. The
different theatres, the vehicles, and different types of airplanes. Another interesting aspect is the close combat which is something you always remember once
you read All Quiet On The Western Front, so its definitely applaudable that the developers
took a look at the whole conflict and all its aspects.
The trailer itself also shows a product which
is not yet finished and most of the scenes are only seen for the blink of an eye, so
we dont know for sure how loose or accurate the whole game will be. For example, in a
few shots you see soldiers which appear to wear customised equipment while other scenes
show accurate uniforms and equipment. Could very well be that this is an indication for
the different game modes. Looks like a lot of fun, though.
Look forward to playing it..Putri LaksmiDecember 07, 2017AdminBandung Indonesia
I'm Indy Neidell and here is a Great War Special DICE and Electronic Arts announced that the
next installment of their video game series Battlefield will be set in World War 1. Now,
since the first trailer was published, thousands of people have joined our channel, which is
cool. And to welcome all the new fans and the older ones who are excited for the game
too, we decided to make an extra episode analyzing the trailer. 0:06 - 0:07
What do we see? A German soldier beats a British or US soldier with a makeshift trench club.
The background is hazy and muddy and we see observation balloons and tree stumps.
Close Quarters Combat was very common in trench
warfare, and the soldiers often used improvised weapons. The German Soldier: He is wearing a typical
German gas mask - seems to the be M1917 model. Instead of the standard German Stahlhelm,
he seems to wear a metal (skull-) cap of some sort. Maybe the Stirnpanzer was the inspiration
for this.
It was part of the armour that was issued to Machine Gun sentries. The other
part was what we call lobster armour. He is also wearing the full marching gear Which is kind of odd to wear in the
field. We see some patch insignia on the shoulder - this is not in line with actual uniform
style.
One explanation could be that this is for the Squad insignia in the game. You
can see the red finish on his collar as well, which is the colour of the pioneers or the
infantry. In the close up you see German leather ammo and gear pouches. Looks like hes wearing
a scarf too.
The British or American soldier: He seems
to wear the SBR Small Box Respirator. And the typical British canvas belt and ammo pouches.
And what looks like a trench coat with a turned up collar. This is interesting: When he turns
around you can see a Geballte Ladung on his back - charges of multiple German Stielhandgranaten bound together. These were used in WW1 to penetrate weaker armours before real anti tank weapons were available.
The Battlefield: The tree stumps, the mud,
and the barbed wire are straight from the classic images of the Western Front. You can
see some ruins too. And at least 5 observation balloons. There are also Flak shells exploding
in the air.
0:08 - 0:12
The next scene is set in the desert and you can see a lonely horse rider. The area covering
Egypt, the Arabian Peninsula, Mesopotamia, Persia, Palestine, and up to Anatolia was
an important theatre of World War 1 once the Ottoman Empire entered the war. Horses were
used to cover the distances, of course, as were camels. The rider is wearing more traditional gear
including ammo bandoliers as a belt.
And she is notably pulling a sabre. The stirrup-hilted
handle is actually more common for European or British Hussars. It definitely doesnt
look like the typical scimitar that was common in the area. But since the British were heavily
involved in the the Middle East, this would possibly be available, though sabres were
status things and not often lost or given away.
In the close up we can see that the women
riding the horse has facial tattoos resembling bedouin tribes. The tribes were notably persuaded
to rise up against the Ottomans in the Arab Revolt with support of the British, notably
T.E. Lawrence aka. Lawrence of Arabia.
0:13 - 0:14
The next scene seems to cover aerial combat on the Western Front again. In the foreground
we see the tail gunner of a plane which might be a Sopwith Strutter 1 . Hes firing
the aerial Lewis Gun, according to our friend Othais who made a video about the guns seen
in the trailer. The insignia on the wing indicates that this is a plane from the Royal Flying
Corps, the predecessor of the Royal Air Force.
In the background you can see observation
balloons again, there is a river and cutting through the battlefield and on the left you
can actually see some untouched landscape not yet consumed by trench warfare. This is
a nice idea, however the actual distances would be much greater, since behind the trenches
you had supplies, maybe even 1 or 2 more trench systems and so forth. In the far back and in the beginning of the
shot you can see the famous red Fokker Dr 1 triplane as flown by the Red Baron. Of course
the plane in this colour is very noticeable, but Richthofens Squadron was called the
Flying Circus because the planes all were painted in different colours.
Furthermore,
not all pilots choose to do this at all. The scene covers another Plane which looks like
another Sopwith Strutter too. 0:14 - 0:18
This seems to be the same scene again but now we are on the ground. The Sopwith is flying
above and more planes can be seen in the background.
You can also spot the fields and the river
again. But of course the interesting part is the
foreground here where 7 soldiers are fighting. Because of the contrast, we cannot make out
a lot of details. But the 2nd and 3rd soldier from the right are engaged in close combat
again.
This time the German soldier is wearing the M1916 Stahlhelm and his weapon of choice
is the Grabenspaten. According to Erich Maria Remarque in All Quiet On The Western Front
German soldiers used this instead of bayonet because the bayonet had the tendency to get
stuck in the rib cage of your enemy. The spade however, was so sharp that you could cut through
the whole body. The German soldier is also wearing crutches on his back.
Maybe he is
a medic. Of course no one would carry those in a trench assault but this is probably about
recognising the medic in the game. The soldier getting hit with the spade seems
to be an American soldier, at least he is carrying the Winchester 1897 Shotgun. He is
also carrying the bayonet holster which is an odd combo with the shotgun.
There is of
course the famous story that the Germans considered this weapon to barbaric in combat and protested
in 1918. Same thing happened with Dum Dum Bullets. In the background of this scene you can see
either smoke or gas. A variety of chemical agents were used during the war.
We made a
whole special episode about them. 0:18 - 0:20
The next scene is again a German Fokker Dr. 1 Triplane chasing another plane through the
canyons. He is firing a German IMG08/15.
The Fokker Dr. 1 Never flew in the Middle East
and certainly not the Red Baron who was on the Eastern and Western Front. Airplanes in
the Middle East had more of an reconnaissance role, but there were Ottoman Aces too. 0:20 - 0:23
We are switching back to the Western Front and see a plane crashing into a windmill.
The fields in Flanders and Northern France probably had those at some point.
Its odd
that this one is still standing though and hasnt been pulverised by artillery. The
soldier in the foreground seems to be British or American again. You can see his backpack
and spade quite well. The soldier on the left is a bit puzzling.
From the colours and gear,
it seems to be a German soldier. Contrary to the other soldiers seen so far, he is very
lightly equipped with a spade, a bayonet, a gas mask container on the back. He is not
even wearing a helmet but the German Feldmtze without a visor which means he is not an officer. 0:24
We see a quick shot of a tank driver.
Yes, the tanks were controlled by levers. 0:25-0:26
The desert again: In the quick camera pan, we see a British Mark IV tank and a soldier
stumbling. He might be Ottoman actually, since a few thousand M1916 helmets were issued to
the Ottoman Army. After the pan another Mark IV appears accompanied by a soldier wearing
a German anti tank rifle, the T-Gewehr.
But the soldier seem to be British judging from,
for example, the puttees. Does that make sense? Well, yes. Whole books have been written about
foreign rifles in the armies and it was common to try to incorporate captured equipment into
your own army. There were limits to that of course.
The gear of this soldier is a bit
puzzling to me, the hood and shoulder patches dont ring any bell. We see some soldiers charging on horses and
being attacked by a biplane. The soldiers have different head gear from scarves to helmets
and goggles. Pretty sure that that they would not attack a tank in a frontal assault.
Actually,
we only found references to a few Mark I tanks serving in the Battle of Gaza. Other lighter
vehicles were used in the desert though. 0:27 - 0:28
This shot is a bit puzzling. Othais says the person we see is firing the classic Colt M1911.
Other than that you cannot really see anything.
The architecture of the building could be
as much Paris as it could be Berlin so who knows where it is. 0:28 - 0:30
Then theres a new scenario. Its a forest with a ruin in the back. There was heavy fighting
in places like the Argonnes, so this is not unusual.
The character whose Point of View
we see is carrying a Lewis Gun. The important thing of course is the green cloud in the
centre which might be chlorine gas, or chlorine mixed with phosgene, called Green Cross. While
the soldier on the left is already collapsing, the one standing right in the cloud seems
to be fine. On the right side a heavy gun is firing.
This
could be the French 75 mm field gun which was widely used during World War 1 and was
also used to deliver gas shells. It was also exported to other nations. 0:30 - 0:31
That armour is ridiculous. There were experiments with body armours and masks and stuff like
that, but they looked a lot clunkier than that.
The Germans had the lobster armour for
their sentries but it was impractical for movement. Knowing the materials available
at the time, the mask would also be pretty heavy. We dont know what kind of machine
gun hes firing. But it seems a bit out of place.
The soldiers that get shot by that guy are
Italian soldiers in a valley of the Isonzo Front. Othais says that the weapons models
dont really check out, yet, but it might be placeholders or unfinished designs. The
Italian soldiers are wearing their version of the Adrian helmet and standard uniforms
with pouches. Interestingly, the soldier in the front seems to have a axe or ice axe Benito Mussolini was a big
fan of knives, for example, and the Italian elite storm troops, the Arditi, also used
them a lot.
The axes were the same tools they used to dig shelters into the rock. The soldier
is also wearing the grenade bundle on his back. In the background one of the soldiers is equipped
with a flame thrower. Some pictures of flamethrowers we see in World War 1 show that these
were used by teams, but there were smaller versions too that could be carried by one
soldier.
0:32 - 0:34
We are in the air above the Italian front again. Apart from the planes and balloons
we already know, the terrain is very interesting. It seems more open than the other scenes and
we can see a lot of height differences too. That is of course completely in line with
the actual battlefields of that front.
In the beginning there was a stalemate there
too but with later offensives the front was much more dynamic than you might think, especially
in 1917 when Erwin Rommel fought there, for example. 0:35 - 0:38
The shot opens with a Mark IV tank again and then we are in the trenches for the first
time. These seem to be British soldiers which wear Brodie Helmets, the normal uniforms and
equipment, as well as the Lee Enfield .303 Rifles - one of the most recognisable rifles
of the war. Some soldiers have their bayonets mounted.
One soldier is preparing to go over
the top, he is wearing a handgun and just a cap. The surrounding area is still pretty
much in tact, you can see trees. The tank blasting over the trench is actually right
because thats what they were invented for. 0:40
Flamethrower guy again.
You can see his protective gear pretty well. 0:41- 0:42
An armoured train! The Germans used those at Verdun and the Belgians also had some.
They also played an important role in Eastern Europe in the different wars that broke out
there after World War 1. The ship firing the broadside appears to be
a an Iron Duke class battleship. People usually think that the navies didnt play a big
role in World War 1, but when you follow our show, you know that there were several naval
battles, most notably the Battle of Jutland.
The planes attacking the ship in the next
shot are not seaplanes which is what would have been used in open waters. Airplane carriers
in the classical sense were not used in World War 1, but ships could carry seaplanes very
well. 0:43
The plane crashing into the ground seems to be a German Gotha G.I. Bomber.
0:46
We are in a British or American artillery position. The guns firing look like 9.2 Inch
howitzers. The shells lying around like that are a nice detail because thats actually
how it looked like during a battle. Artillery caused 75% of all casualties in the entire
war and was enormously important in all theatres.
In the beginning it was less focused, but
throughout the war more sophisticated tactics like the creeping barrage were invented. 0:49
We can briefly see a side mounted scope for a German Gewehr 98. Sniping or Sharpshooting
was a part of striking fear and terror on the other side. Snipers would pick targets
in the other trenches which were sometimes not very far away.
0:55
The final shot of the trailer is an iconic German Zeppelin. The Germans used them for
tactical bombing on the Western and Eastern Front as well as for recon. They were not
very precise for bombing at all, but the Germans counted on the psychological effect. Contrary
to popular belief, these could not be shot down easily because they flew higher than
most fighters or artillery shells and a simple hole in the skin wouldnt do much harm since
they had many separate gas compartments.
Later on more sophisticated tactics were developed
like incendiary bullets. We got asked a lot how accurate the trailer is in historical terms. Its difficult
to say. Some of the scenes feature some unusual or experimental gear and some weapons are
carried by soldiers from the other side.
Overall, it is an entertainment product foremost and
you probably wont get an accurate depiction of the horrors of this war. However, the trailer
already shows a lot of aspects that are usually forgotten when talking about this war. The
different theatres, the vehicles, and different types of airplanes. Another interesting aspect is the close combat which is something you always remember once
you read All Quiet On The Western Front, so its definitely applaudable that the developers
took a look at the whole conflict and all its aspects.
The trailer itself also shows a product which
is not yet finished and most of the scenes are only seen for the blink of an eye, so
we dont know for sure how loose or accurate the whole game will be. For example, in a
few shots you see soldiers which appear to wear customised equipment while other scenes
show accurate uniforms and equipment. Could very well be that this is an indication for
the different game modes. Looks like a lot of fun, though.
Look forward to playing it..
It's September of the year 331 BC. After taking Phoenicia and Egypt, Alexander marches east, to the inland of the Persian Empire. As his troops were about to cross the Tigris river, he received scout reports, that Persian King Darius had gathered another huge army and was preparing for a decisive encounter with the Macedonians. Both armies finally met on the vast open field near the village of Gaugamela in a final clash between two of the biggest powers of classical antiquity.
It's beginning of the year 331 BC. After the successful subjugation of Tyre and Gaza, the Macedonian army took some time to regenerate in the rich valley of the Nile. The Egyptian satrap didn't try to oppose Alexander, as the Macedonian was seen as a liberator rather than an invader, since Egypt wasn't the most loyal of Persian provinces. After the crushing defeat near Issus, Persian King Darius changed his approach and tried to stop Alexander's extraordinary conquest by using diplomacy.
Yet the Macedonian King refused Darius' increasingly generous terms thrice, and with winter passing by, he started to draw the plans for the upcoming Babylonian campaign. With all preparations completed, the refreshed and decently supplied Macedonian force marched out back to Phoenicia in the beginning of April. It's worth noting, that Alexander paid significant attention to the often overlooked logistical part of his conquests. Maintaining such a considerable force in excellent shape for many years far away from home required exceptional planning and stellar management.
For as long as it was possible, the Macedonian army stuck to the coast, and utilized the fleet to take care of provisions. Darius was well informed of the Greek movement and by the time Alexander crossed the Euphratus, the new Persian army was being assembled. The King of Kings expected the Macedonians to march along the river, straight to Babylon, and decided to use scorched earth tactics by ordering the plunder of the Euphratus valley. But thriving cities lying close to the river were decently defended, making supply gathering quite challenging, so Alexander chose a northern route instead which, although longer, had rural settlements that offered easy access to food and water.
Upon hearing the unexpected news, Darius instantly departed Babylon heading north, along the east bank of the Tigris River. He appointed a strong mounted unit under Mazaeus, governor of Babylon to guard the northern crossings of the Tigris and plunder its east bank, to hinder the Macedonian march. But Mazaeus failed to challenge the Greeks during the crossing, and in the middle of September Alexander reached the east side of the river. Darius knew, that the encounter was close, so he started to seek a suitable place for the upcoming battle.
He setup camp on a wide plain near the village of Gaugamela and began preparations. In the meantime Alexander's troops caught a Persian scouting party and found out that Darius was camping 30 kilometres to the east. The Macedonian King quickly dispatched his own scouts and advanced towards the enemy. Camp was set behind a hill about 10 kilometres away from the presumed battlefield nd after a few days of rest, on the last days of September, Alexander departed towards the Persian positions.
The hill between the two armies was guarded by Mazaeus' detachment, but upon seeing at whole Macedonian army was approaching, the Persian nobleman simply retreated without a fight and rode back to the camp, yielding the hill Having the hill was an advantage but Darius still held the open fields which suited combat for his larger army far better. So the hill was important, but an acceptable loss. Alexander took the hill and, after a short examination of the environs, decided to set a temporary camp there. This manoeuvre gave him a significant advantage, as the higher ground provided a good view of the Persian camp and their troop deployment.
Moreover, the hill was well suited for defence purposes, so Alexander didn't rush and comfortably prepared for the battle, making sure his troops were well fed, rested and in good mental condition. In comparison, due to Mazaeus' failure, Darius was under constant threat of sudden Greek attack, even at night, so his troops had to maintain readiness for battle. Of course, Darius had superior numbers, plenty of solid cavalry and suitable terrain, but his army could do nothing but wait for the Macedonians to make the first move, as storming the ridge was not a viable option. The sun slowly set on the horizon, while Alexander discussed the upcoming battle with his officers.
It is said, that his second-in-command, Parmenion, advised a night attack, in order to catch Persians off guard, but Alexander turned down this idea as too risky. The Macedonian command then agreed to attack the next day, in the morning. The night passed by, and the first sun rays lit up the battlefield. It was the 1st of October.
The Persian army was already in battle formations, as they spent the whole night waiting for the Macedonian attack, which never came. Darius efficiently used the manpower of his vast empire, up to 100,000 men were gathered to fight for their king. 10,000 Of the professional Immortal infantry together with a few thousand Greek mercenaries formed the core of the Persian centre. But the real power of Darius' army was positioned on the flanks.
More than 30,000 fine cavalrymen from various Persian satrapies posed a serious threat, especially on such a wide and level battlefield. Darius also had a few hundred Indian scythed chariots and even fifteen elephants, though these animals probably didn't take part in the battle. The rest of his army was formed by various infantry units gathered from tribes inhabiting the Achaemenid Empire, though their battle potential was questionable. Due to the size of Persian army, the command was split between Darius, and his trusted generals - Mazaeus and Bessus.
We could spend another five minutes discussing the exact positions of Bactrian cavalry or Parthian infantry in the Persian battle line, but, as in battle, time is of the essence and at this point, the sun was near noon. Oversleeping Alexander finally awoke, and the refreshed Macedonian army abandoned the hill, and began their deployment. 40,000 Infantrymen and a 7,000 strong cavalry detachment formed a slanted battleline, with the right flank facing the front of the Persian centre. To avoid possible encirclement, both flanks were sufficiently reinforced and slightly curved backwards.
The Macedonian center was occupied by a disciplined sarissa phalanx, supported by solid hypaspist units. Cavalry was split between both flanks, Thessalian units on the left, and Companion cavalry on the right. The second line was occupied by Thracian and Illirian infantry. Just like in previous battles, the command was split between Alexander and Parmenion.
To achieve a flanking advantage, the Macedonian king started to move his line right, but Darius immediately countered by stretching his left flank and matched the opponent's movement. Darius had the battlefield levelled and cleared off any obstacles for more effective chariot use, which is why he wanted to prevent the Macedonians from leaving the prepared ground. Persian cavalry moved out and attacked Alexander's far right. Fierce fighting began, with no clear winner.
But as time passed, Macedonian cavalry prevailed, and routed some of the Persian units, though suffering serious damage. Seeing the trouble on his left, Darius sent all of his scythed chariots to storm the Greek centre. Yet this attack wasn't particularly successful, as defenders opened their ranks and allowed attackers to ride through the line, raining javelins on them at the same time. Following the chariots, the Persian right flank led by Mazaeus stormed Parmenion's side, killing many Greeks in the process and forcing the Macedonian commander to give ground.
Parmenion was in serious trouble, being outnumbered and partially enveloped, but it wasn't the first time he was forced to fight at unfavourable odds. His flank fought bravely, and somehow endured the Persian push, though at high cost. It was at this point that Darius noticed that Alexander was moving his flank to the right while Parmenion stayed on the left, creating a gap in the Macedonian centre. The Persian king saw this as a weak point and impulsively sent his Immortal units to exploit the opening.
But, this was bait. Doing so exposed Dariuss own centre. Alexander had waited for such an opportunity, he swiftly moved Companion cavalry supported by the remaining units of his flank and struck the Persian centre, right where Darius' exposed royal guard stood. Despite the support of the second line units, the impetus of the Macedonian charge quickly broke the Persian line.
Soon, Darius realised the danger and just as he did two years earlier, fled the battlefield. Alexander began pursuit immediately, but soon overturned his temptation and rode back to relieve Parmenion's flank. Fierce combat still raged on the Macedonian left, when rescue finally came, the remaining Persian forces were soon overwhelmed and routed. Although Darius managed to escape yet again, complicating Alexander's political plans to crown himself as the King of Persia, the military power of the Achaemenid Empire was crippled.
Macedonians had the core cities of Mesopotamia and Persia at their fingertips. After the brilliant show of his strategic and tactical prowess near Gaugamela, Alexander effectively ended the hegemony of the powerful Persian Empire in less than five years, but its subjugation didn't satiate his lust for power and his story is yet to be continued..Putri LaksmiDecember 06, 2017AdminBandung Indonesia
It's September of the year 331 BC. After taking Phoenicia and Egypt, Alexander marches east, to the inland of the Persian Empire. As his troops were about to cross the Tigris river, he received scout reports, that Persian King Darius had gathered another huge army and was preparing for a decisive encounter with the Macedonians. Both armies finally met on the vast open field near the village of Gaugamela in a final clash between two of the biggest powers of classical antiquity.
It's beginning of the year 331 BC. After the successful subjugation of Tyre and Gaza, the Macedonian army took some time to regenerate in the rich valley of the Nile. The Egyptian satrap didn't try to oppose Alexander, as the Macedonian was seen as a liberator rather than an invader, since Egypt wasn't the most loyal of Persian provinces. After the crushing defeat near Issus, Persian King Darius changed his approach and tried to stop Alexander's extraordinary conquest by using diplomacy.
Yet the Macedonian King refused Darius' increasingly generous terms thrice, and with winter passing by, he started to draw the plans for the upcoming Babylonian campaign. With all preparations completed, the refreshed and decently supplied Macedonian force marched out back to Phoenicia in the beginning of April. It's worth noting, that Alexander paid significant attention to the often overlooked logistical part of his conquests. Maintaining such a considerable force in excellent shape for many years far away from home required exceptional planning and stellar management.
For as long as it was possible, the Macedonian army stuck to the coast, and utilized the fleet to take care of provisions. Darius was well informed of the Greek movement and by the time Alexander crossed the Euphratus, the new Persian army was being assembled. The King of Kings expected the Macedonians to march along the river, straight to Babylon, and decided to use scorched earth tactics by ordering the plunder of the Euphratus valley. But thriving cities lying close to the river were decently defended, making supply gathering quite challenging, so Alexander chose a northern route instead which, although longer, had rural settlements that offered easy access to food and water.
Upon hearing the unexpected news, Darius instantly departed Babylon heading north, along the east bank of the Tigris River. He appointed a strong mounted unit under Mazaeus, governor of Babylon to guard the northern crossings of the Tigris and plunder its east bank, to hinder the Macedonian march. But Mazaeus failed to challenge the Greeks during the crossing, and in the middle of September Alexander reached the east side of the river. Darius knew, that the encounter was close, so he started to seek a suitable place for the upcoming battle.
He setup camp on a wide plain near the village of Gaugamela and began preparations. In the meantime Alexander's troops caught a Persian scouting party and found out that Darius was camping 30 kilometres to the east. The Macedonian King quickly dispatched his own scouts and advanced towards the enemy. Camp was set behind a hill about 10 kilometres away from the presumed battlefield nd after a few days of rest, on the last days of September, Alexander departed towards the Persian positions.
The hill between the two armies was guarded by Mazaeus' detachment, but upon seeing at whole Macedonian army was approaching, the Persian nobleman simply retreated without a fight and rode back to the camp, yielding the hill Having the hill was an advantage but Darius still held the open fields which suited combat for his larger army far better. So the hill was important, but an acceptable loss. Alexander took the hill and, after a short examination of the environs, decided to set a temporary camp there. This manoeuvre gave him a significant advantage, as the higher ground provided a good view of the Persian camp and their troop deployment.
Moreover, the hill was well suited for defence purposes, so Alexander didn't rush and comfortably prepared for the battle, making sure his troops were well fed, rested and in good mental condition. In comparison, due to Mazaeus' failure, Darius was under constant threat of sudden Greek attack, even at night, so his troops had to maintain readiness for battle. Of course, Darius had superior numbers, plenty of solid cavalry and suitable terrain, but his army could do nothing but wait for the Macedonians to make the first move, as storming the ridge was not a viable option. The sun slowly set on the horizon, while Alexander discussed the upcoming battle with his officers.
It is said, that his second-in-command, Parmenion, advised a night attack, in order to catch Persians off guard, but Alexander turned down this idea as too risky. The Macedonian command then agreed to attack the next day, in the morning. The night passed by, and the first sun rays lit up the battlefield. It was the 1st of October.
The Persian army was already in battle formations, as they spent the whole night waiting for the Macedonian attack, which never came. Darius efficiently used the manpower of his vast empire, up to 100,000 men were gathered to fight for their king. 10,000 Of the professional Immortal infantry together with a few thousand Greek mercenaries formed the core of the Persian centre. But the real power of Darius' army was positioned on the flanks.
More than 30,000 fine cavalrymen from various Persian satrapies posed a serious threat, especially on such a wide and level battlefield. Darius also had a few hundred Indian scythed chariots and even fifteen elephants, though these animals probably didn't take part in the battle. The rest of his army was formed by various infantry units gathered from tribes inhabiting the Achaemenid Empire, though their battle potential was questionable. Due to the size of Persian army, the command was split between Darius, and his trusted generals - Mazaeus and Bessus.
We could spend another five minutes discussing the exact positions of Bactrian cavalry or Parthian infantry in the Persian battle line, but, as in battle, time is of the essence and at this point, the sun was near noon. Oversleeping Alexander finally awoke, and the refreshed Macedonian army abandoned the hill, and began their deployment. 40,000 Infantrymen and a 7,000 strong cavalry detachment formed a slanted battleline, with the right flank facing the front of the Persian centre. To avoid possible encirclement, both flanks were sufficiently reinforced and slightly curved backwards.
The Macedonian center was occupied by a disciplined sarissa phalanx, supported by solid hypaspist units. Cavalry was split between both flanks, Thessalian units on the left, and Companion cavalry on the right. The second line was occupied by Thracian and Illirian infantry. Just like in previous battles, the command was split between Alexander and Parmenion.
To achieve a flanking advantage, the Macedonian king started to move his line right, but Darius immediately countered by stretching his left flank and matched the opponent's movement. Darius had the battlefield levelled and cleared off any obstacles for more effective chariot use, which is why he wanted to prevent the Macedonians from leaving the prepared ground. Persian cavalry moved out and attacked Alexander's far right. Fierce fighting began, with no clear winner.
But as time passed, Macedonian cavalry prevailed, and routed some of the Persian units, though suffering serious damage. Seeing the trouble on his left, Darius sent all of his scythed chariots to storm the Greek centre. Yet this attack wasn't particularly successful, as defenders opened their ranks and allowed attackers to ride through the line, raining javelins on them at the same time. Following the chariots, the Persian right flank led by Mazaeus stormed Parmenion's side, killing many Greeks in the process and forcing the Macedonian commander to give ground.
Parmenion was in serious trouble, being outnumbered and partially enveloped, but it wasn't the first time he was forced to fight at unfavourable odds. His flank fought bravely, and somehow endured the Persian push, though at high cost. It was at this point that Darius noticed that Alexander was moving his flank to the right while Parmenion stayed on the left, creating a gap in the Macedonian centre. The Persian king saw this as a weak point and impulsively sent his Immortal units to exploit the opening.
But, this was bait. Doing so exposed Dariuss own centre. Alexander had waited for such an opportunity, he swiftly moved Companion cavalry supported by the remaining units of his flank and struck the Persian centre, right where Darius' exposed royal guard stood. Despite the support of the second line units, the impetus of the Macedonian charge quickly broke the Persian line.
Soon, Darius realised the danger and just as he did two years earlier, fled the battlefield. Alexander began pursuit immediately, but soon overturned his temptation and rode back to relieve Parmenion's flank. Fierce combat still raged on the Macedonian left, when rescue finally came, the remaining Persian forces were soon overwhelmed and routed. Although Darius managed to escape yet again, complicating Alexander's political plans to crown himself as the King of Persia, the military power of the Achaemenid Empire was crippled.
Macedonians had the core cities of Mesopotamia and Persia at their fingertips. After the brilliant show of his strategic and tactical prowess near Gaugamela, Alexander effectively ended the hegemony of the powerful Persian Empire in less than five years, but its subjugation didn't satiate his lust for power and his story is yet to be continued..